Washington States Comparative Fault Practice Exam Quiz
What is the purpose of the comparative fault system in Washington?
A) To eliminate fault from legal cases
B) To divide fault between parties involved in an accident
C) To assign full liability to one party
D) To encourage settlements before lawsuits
Answer: B) To divide fault between parties involved in an accident
In Washington, what happens when a party is found to be 50% or more at fault in an accident?
A) They are liable for the entire damage
B) They are not liable for any damages
C) They are only partially liable
D) Their liability is capped at 50%
Answer: A) They are liable for the entire damage
Which of the following is true regarding comparative fault in Washington?
A) It uses a pure comparative fault system
B) It uses a modified comparative fault system
C) It does not allow fault to be assigned to plaintiffs
D) The defendant cannot have any fault assigned to them
Answer: B) It uses a modified comparative fault system
Under Washington’s comparative fault rule, if a plaintiff is 40% at fault, what happens to their damages?
A) They cannot recover any damages
B) They can recover 60% of the damages
C) They can recover 40% of the damages
D) They can recover 100% of the damages
Answer: B) They can recover 60% of the damages
In Washington, if a defendant is found to be 30% at fault, how is the liability for damages allocated?
A) The defendant pays 30% of the total damages
B) The defendant pays 70% of the total damages
C) The defendant is fully responsible for the damages
D) The defendant pays only medical expenses
Answer: A) The defendant pays 30% of the total damages
What happens if the plaintiff is found to be 51% or more at fault in Washington?
A) The plaintiff still receives damages
B) The plaintiff can only recover half the damages
C) The plaintiff is barred from recovering damages
D) The defendant is completely exonerated
Answer: C) The plaintiff is barred from recovering damages
Which of the following is a primary feature of Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) Fault is determined only by the judge
B) The jury can apportion fault between multiple parties
C) Only the defendant’s actions are considered in apportioning fault
D) The amount of damages is predetermined
Answer: B) The jury can apportion fault between multiple parties
How does the comparative fault system impact settlement negotiations in Washington?
A) It simplifies settlement because fault is not considered
B) It encourages defendants to settle out of court to avoid paying a larger share of damages
C) It prevents any settlement before a trial
D) It makes settlements unnecessary
Answer: B) It encourages defendants to settle out of court to avoid paying a larger share of damages
In Washington, when multiple parties are involved in an accident, what happens if one party is not at fault?
A) They are entitled to full damages
B) They pay a percentage of the damages based on their share of fault
C) They are excluded from the case
D) They must contribute to the damages regardless of fault
Answer: A) They are entitled to full damages
Which of the following does not factor into the determination of fault in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) The actions of both parties involved
B) The severity of the accident
C) The victim’s ability to avoid harm
D) The financial status of the defendant
Answer: D) The financial status of the defendant
What is the result if a defendant is found to be 0% at fault in a Washington comparative fault case?
A) They pay no damages
B) They are still responsible for damages
C) They can receive damages if the plaintiff is found to be at fault
D) They must pay punitive damages
Answer: A) They pay no damages
In Washington, can the fault of an insurance company be considered in a comparative fault case?
A) No, only the parties involved in the accident are considered
B) Yes, the actions of an insurance company can be factored in
C) No, insurance companies are never liable for any damages
D) Yes, but only if the insurance company is the plaintiff
Answer: B) Yes, the actions of an insurance company can be factored in
How does Washington’s modified comparative fault system differ from a pure comparative fault system?
A) It allows plaintiffs with any level of fault to recover damages
B) It bars recovery if a plaintiff is 50% or more at fault
C) It does not allow a jury to apportion fault
D) It automatically assigns fault to the defendant
Answer: B) It bars recovery if a plaintiff is 50% or more at fault
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, if two parties are each found to be 50% at fault, how are damages divided?
A) Each party pays half of the damages
B) One party pays all of the damages
C) The damages are shared equally regardless of fault
D) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
Answer: A) Each party pays half of the damages
If a jury in Washington finds that a plaintiff is 10% at fault, what is the maximum amount they can recover in damages?
A) 10% of the total damages
B) 90% of the total damages
C) 100% of the damages
D) They cannot recover any damages
Answer: B) 90% of the total damages
Can a defendant challenge the fault percentage assigned to them in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) No, once assigned, the percentage is final
B) Yes, they can appeal the percentage allocation
C) No, fault is determined only by the jury
D) Yes, but only if they are the plaintiff
Answer: B) Yes, they can appeal the percentage allocation
What is the maximum fault percentage a plaintiff can have under Washington’s comparative fault system and still recover damages?
A) 50%
B) 60%
C) 51%
D) 75%
Answer: A) 50%
Which of the following would most likely be considered a factor when determining fault in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) The plaintiff’s health status
B) The defendant’s behavior during the accident
C) The amount of insurance coverage
D) The nature of the plaintiff’s job
Answer: B) The defendant’s behavior during the accident
What is the standard for determining fault in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) A party’s actions must be the direct cause of the accident
B) The party’s actions only need to contribute to the accident
C) Fault can only be assigned to one party
D) There must be clear intent to harm for fault to be assigned
Answer: B) The party’s actions only need to contribute to the accident
If a plaintiff’s fault is found to be 40%, and the total damages amount to $100,000, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $60,000
B) $40,000
C) $100,000
D) $80,000
Answer: A) $60,000
In Washington, which of the following may not be considered when apportioning fault?
A) The condition of the road at the time of the accident
B) Whether the plaintiff was using a seatbelt
C) The defendant’s previous criminal record
D) The weather conditions during the accident
Answer: C) The defendant’s previous criminal record
In Washington, if both parties are equally at fault in an accident, how are damages typically allocated?
A) The defendant is not liable
B) The plaintiff recovers 50% of the damages
C) The plaintiff recovers all damages
D) Damages are equally shared
Answer: D) Damages are equally shared
Which of the following is the role of the jury in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) To assign a final percentage of fault to each party
B) To decide the total damages amount without considering fault
C) To represent the defendant’s interests
D) To determine the guilt or innocence of the parties involved
Answer: A) To assign a final percentage of fault to each party
In Washington, if a party is found 100% at fault for the accident, what is the outcome for that party?
A) They pay all damages
B) They pay 50% of the damages
C) They are not liable for any damages
D) They are automatically entitled to damages
Answer: A) They pay all damages
Can comparative fault apply in cases involving personal injury and property damage in Washington?
A) No, it only applies to personal injury cases
B) Yes, it applies to both personal injury and property damage cases
C) No, it only applies to property damage cases
D) Yes, but only for commercial property cases
Answer: B) Yes, it applies to both personal injury and property damage cases
Which of the following factors is most likely to affect a party’s comparative fault percentage in Washington?
A) The defendant’s financial stability
B) The defendant’s previous accidents
C) The plaintiff’s actions leading to the accident
D) The plaintiff’s employment status
Answer: C) The plaintiff’s actions leading to the accident
In Washington, if a defendant admits partial fault in an accident, what is the effect on the case?
A) The defendant can no longer be held liable for damages
B) The defendant’s percentage of fault is automatically increased
C) The defendant’s admission can reduce their share of the damages
D) The defendant must pay the full damages
Answer: C) The defendant’s admission can reduce their share of the damages
What is a potential outcome if both parties are found to be equally at fault in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) One party is entitled to damages
B) The case is dismissed
C) Damages are shared equally between the parties
D) The plaintiff can recover full damages
Answer: C) Damages are shared equally between the parties
How does Washington’s comparative fault system affect personal injury lawsuits?
A) It requires a party to have no fault to recover damages
B) It encourages parties to settle based on fault allocation
C) It automatically assigns fault to the defendant
D) It prevents plaintiffs from suing if they share fault
Answer: B) It encourages parties to settle based on fault allocation
Which of the following is NOT a key element in determining fault in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) The actions of all parties involved
B) The location of the accident
C) The weather conditions during the accident
D) The degree of responsibility each party bears
Answer: B) The location of the accident
Which of the following is the standard applied in Washington when determining whether a plaintiff can recover damages in a comparative fault case?
A) If the defendant is more than 51% at fault
B) If the plaintiff is less than 50% at fault
C) If the defendant is 100% at fault
D) If the plaintiff’s actions contributed to the accident
Answer: B) If the plaintiff is less than 50% at fault
If a defendant is found to be 80% at fault in Washington, how much of the damages would they be responsible for?
A) 80% of the total damages
B) 100% of the total damages
C) 20% of the total damages
D) No responsibility for damages
Answer: A) 80% of the total damages
If both the plaintiff and the defendant are found to be equally at fault in Washington, how are the damages split?
A) The plaintiff receives no damages
B) The damages are split equally between the two parties
C) The defendant pays all damages
D) The plaintiff must pay half of the damages
Answer: B) The damages are split equally between the two parties
In Washington, what is the result if a plaintiff is found to be 50% or more at fault for an accident?
A) The plaintiff can still recover damages
B) The plaintiff cannot recover damages
C) The plaintiff receives half of the damages
D) The plaintiff is entitled to full damages minus 50%
Answer: B) The plaintiff cannot recover damages
What happens if a plaintiff is found to be 25% at fault and the total damages are $200,000 in Washington?
A) The plaintiff recovers $150,000
B) The plaintiff recovers $50,000
C) The plaintiff recovers $200,000
D) The plaintiff does not recover any damages
Answer: A) The plaintiff recovers $150,000
How does Washington’s comparative fault system affect lawsuits involving multiple defendants?
A) Only one defendant can be held responsible for the damages
B) Fault is divided among all defendants based on their level of responsibility
C) Defendants must share damages equally, regardless of fault
D) Plaintiffs cannot sue more than one defendant
Answer: B) Fault is divided among all defendants based on their level of responsibility
In Washington, which factor is considered when determining the percentage of fault for each party in an accident?
A) The weather conditions during the accident
B) The severity of the plaintiff’s injuries
C) The actions of both parties that contributed to the accident
D) The defendant’s previous legal history
Answer: C) The actions of both parties that contributed to the accident
Which of the following statements about Washington’s comparative fault system is false?
A) The plaintiff can recover damages if they are less than 50% at fault
B) Fault is shared proportionally based on each party’s actions
C) The defendant is always fully liable, regardless of the plaintiff’s fault
D) The plaintiff cannot recover damages if they are 51% or more at fault
Answer: C) The defendant is always fully liable, regardless of the plaintiff’s fault
If a defendant is found to be 60% at fault in Washington, what will be the impact on their liability?
A) The defendant is not responsible for any damages
B) The defendant pays 60% of the total damages
C) The defendant is responsible for 40% of the damages
D) The defendant can only be liable for 50% of the damages
Answer: B) The defendant pays 60% of the total damages
Which of the following is true about Washington’s comparative fault system and joint liability?
A) Only one defendant is held liable for all damages
B) The jury decides the percentage of fault for each party
C) Joint liability means both defendants pay the same amount of damages
D) Each defendant’s liability is based solely on their actions, not shared responsibility
Answer: B) The jury decides the percentage of fault for each party
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, how are damages calculated when multiple parties are involved?
A) Each party pays an equal share of the total damages
B) Each party is responsible for their percentage of fault in the accident
C) Damages are calculated by considering only the defendant’s actions
D) Damages are awarded to the plaintiff based on the severity of the injury
Answer: B) Each party is responsible for their percentage of fault in the accident
In Washington, can a party’s previous accidents be used to determine fault in a current case?
A) Yes, if the previous accidents are directly related to the current incident
B) No, only the actions of the parties involved in the current accident matter
C) Yes, as long as the previous accidents were intentional
D) No, previous accidents are irrelevant to fault determination
Answer: A) Yes, if the previous accidents are directly related to the current incident
What is the role of the judge in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) To assign a percentage of fault to each party
B) To decide the total amount of damages
C) To instruct the jury on the law and how to apply the comparative fault system
D) To determine the fault of the plaintiff and dismiss the case if they are found responsible
Answer: C) To instruct the jury on the law and how to apply the comparative fault system
If the plaintiff is found to be 20% at fault and the defendant 80% at fault in Washington, how will the damages be distributed?
A) The defendant pays all the damages
B) The plaintiff pays 20% of the damages, and the defendant pays the rest
C) The damages are split evenly
D) The plaintiff receives full damages
Answer: B) The plaintiff pays 20% of the damages, and the defendant pays the rest
What happens if the court finds both the defendant and the plaintiff equally responsible for the accident?
A) The case is dismissed
B) The damages are split equally between the two parties
C) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
D) The defendant is solely responsible for the damages
Answer: B) The damages are split equally between the two parties
In Washington, if a plaintiff is found to be 49% at fault, can they still recover damages?
A) Yes, they can recover 51% of the damages
B) Yes, they can recover up to 49% of the damages
C) No, they cannot recover any damages
D) Yes, they can recover the full amount of damages minus their fault
Answer: D) Yes, they can recover the full amount of damages minus their fault
Which of the following would most likely lead to a defendant being found less at fault in Washington?
A) The defendant did not have insurance
B) The defendant tried to avoid the accident but failed
C) The plaintiff was completely aware of the hazard
D) The defendant was speeding at the time of the accident
Answer: B) The defendant tried to avoid the accident but failed
How does Washington’s modified comparative fault system differ from a pure comparative fault system?
A) In Washington, the plaintiff can recover damages if they are 50% or more at fault
B) In Washington, the plaintiff is barred from recovering damages if they are 51% or more at fault
C) In Washington, a defendant’s previous fault is not considered
D) In Washington, fault is not distributed between parties
Answer: B) In Washington, the plaintiff is barred from recovering damages if they are 51% or more at fault
Which of the following is a key benefit of the comparative fault system in Washington?
A) It encourages all parties to accept full responsibility for their actions
B) It ensures that the plaintiff receives the maximum possible damages
C) It ensures that fault is distributed fairly based on the parties’ actions
D) It simplifies legal processes by removing fault from consideration
Answer: C) It ensures that fault is distributed fairly based on the parties’ actions
In Washington, what is the consequence if the jury finds the plaintiff to be 51% at fault?
A) The plaintiff can still recover damages, but the amount is reduced by 51%
B) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
C) The plaintiff recovers all damages
D) The defendant is liable for all damages
Answer: B) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, what must a plaintiff prove to recover damages?
A) The defendant was 100% at fault
B) The plaintiff is not at fault
C) The plaintiff is less than 50% at fault
D) The plaintiff’s damages exceed the defendant’s fault
Answer: C) The plaintiff is less than 50% at fault
What is the maximum percentage of fault a plaintiff can have in Washington to still recover damages?
A) 100%
B) 51%
C) 49%
D) 25%
Answer: C) 49%
In a case where both parties are at fault, which of the following is true under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) The party with the greater fault pays all damages
B) The damages are divided based on each party’s percentage of fault
C) The defendant pays all damages, regardless of the plaintiff’s fault
D) The plaintiff must pay part of the damages
Answer: B) The damages are divided based on each party’s percentage of fault
Which of the following is an example of contributory negligence in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) The plaintiff suffers injuries without contributing to the accident
B) The plaintiff failed to wear a seatbelt during a car accident
C) The defendant was speeding but did not cause the accident
D) The defendant was intoxicated at the time of the accident
Answer: B) The plaintiff failed to wear a seatbelt during a car accident
What does Washington’s comparative fault system allow a jury to consider?
A) The severity of injuries
B) The plaintiff’s previous legal history
C) The percentage of fault of each party
D) Whether the accident was intentional
Answer: C) The percentage of fault of each party
In Washington, which party can recover damages when both the plaintiff and defendant share fault?
A) Only the defendant
B) Only the plaintiff
C) Both parties can recover based on their percentage of fault
D) Neither party can recover damages
Answer: C) Both parties can recover based on their percentage of fault
If a plaintiff in Washington is found to be 49% at fault and the total damages are $100,000, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $49,000
B) $51,000
C) $100,000
D) $0
Answer: B) $51,000
What happens if a defendant is found to be 100% at fault in Washington?
A) The plaintiff is barred from recovering damages
B) The defendant is responsible for all the damages
C) The plaintiff must recover some damages based on their fault
D) The defendant’s insurance company pays only 50% of the damages
Answer: B) The defendant is responsible for all the damages
In Washington, how is fault apportioned if multiple defendants are involved in an accident?
A) Fault is divided equally among all defendants
B) Fault is apportioned based on each defendant’s actions
C) The plaintiff is always deemed partially at fault
D) The jury decides which defendant is most at fault
Answer: B) Fault is apportioned based on each defendant’s actions
Which of the following statements about Washington’s comparative fault system is true?
A) If the plaintiff is at fault, they cannot file a lawsuit
B) If the defendant is partially at fault, they are not responsible for damages
C) Fault is determined solely by the amount of damage caused
D) The plaintiff can recover damages as long as they are less than 50% at fault
Answer: D) The plaintiff can recover damages as long as they are less than 50% at fault
In Washington, what is the purpose of comparative fault?
A) To ensure that the plaintiff receives maximum compensation regardless of fault
B) To ensure that the defendant is always responsible for the damages
C) To determine how fault is shared between parties involved in an accident
D) To simplify legal proceedings by eliminating any responsibility for the plaintiff
Answer: C) To determine how fault is shared between parties involved in an accident
How does Washington’s comparative fault system impact a plaintiff’s compensation in a car accident case?
A) It reduces the compensation based on the percentage of fault the plaintiff shares
B) It guarantees full compensation to the plaintiff regardless of their fault
C) It prevents the plaintiff from recovering damages if the defendant is at fault
D) It provides an additional bonus for the plaintiff if they are less than 25% at fault
Answer: A) It reduces the compensation based on the percentage of fault the plaintiff shares
If a plaintiff is found to be 10% at fault in Washington, how will that affect their recovery if the total damages are $200,000?
A) The plaintiff will recover $200,000
B) The plaintiff will recover $180,000
C) The plaintiff will recover $100,000
D) The plaintiff will recover $10,000
Answer: B) The plaintiff will recover $180,000
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, which of the following is the primary factor in determining the defendant’s responsibility?
A) Whether the defendant was driving under the influence
B) The defendant’s level of negligence or fault in causing the accident
C) The plaintiff’s age and health condition
D) Whether the defendant has insurance
Answer: B) The defendant’s level of negligence or fault in causing the accident
What is the effect of Washington’s comparative fault system on a defendant who is found 50% at fault?
A) The defendant pays half of the damages
B) The defendant is responsible for all damages
C) The defendant can’t be sued for damages
D) The defendant pays a reduced amount based on the severity of injuries
Answer: A) The defendant pays half of the damages
In Washington, if a plaintiff is found 40% at fault, and the total damages are $120,000, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $72,000
B) $120,000
C) $48,000
D) $60,000
Answer: A) $72,000
Which of the following is NOT a defense available under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) The plaintiff failed to mitigate their damages
B) The plaintiff was partially at fault
C) The defendant is not responsible for any damages
D) The plaintiff assumed the risk of injury
Answer: C) The defendant is not responsible for any damages
In a car accident case in Washington, the jury finds that the plaintiff is 30% at fault and the defendant is 70% at fault. If the total damages are $50,000, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $50,000
B) $35,000
C) $15,000
D) $30,000
Answer: B) $35,000
What is the rule in Washington if a defendant is found to be more than 50% at fault in an accident?
A) The defendant is not responsible for damages
B) The defendant is fully liable for the damages
C) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
D) The damages are divided equally
Answer: B) The defendant is fully liable for the damages
How does comparative fault impact the amount of damages awarded to a plaintiff in Washington?
A) It increases the total damages based on the plaintiff’s contribution to the accident
B) It reduces the total damages based on the plaintiff’s percentage of fault
C) It guarantees full damages for the plaintiff
D) It has no impact on the damages awarded
Answer: B) It reduces the total damages based on the plaintiff’s percentage of fault
What is the legal term for the principle that allows a defendant to argue that the plaintiff’s own actions contributed to the injury in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) Assumption of risk
B) Contributory negligence
C) Last clear chance doctrine
D) Comparative negligence
Answer: D) Comparative negligence
Which of the following best describes Washington’s approach to a case where both the plaintiff and defendant have contributed to the accident?
A) The defendant pays 100% of the damages
B) The plaintiff’s damages are reduced in proportion to their fault
C) The plaintiff cannot recover damages
D) The damages are split equally between the parties
Answer: B) The plaintiff’s damages are reduced in proportion to their fault
In Washington, what happens if the jury finds that the plaintiff is 51% or more at fault in an accident?
A) The plaintiff receives full compensation for their damages
B) The defendant’s liability is reduced by 51%
C) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
D) The jury cannot award any damages to the defendant
Answer: C) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
What is the primary goal of Washington’s comparative fault system in tort cases?
A) To simplify the legal process by eliminating fault determination
B) To ensure that defendants pay for damages regardless of fault
C) To allocate damages fairly based on each party’s responsibility for the accident
D) To reduce the number of lawsuits filed
Answer: C) To allocate damages fairly based on each party’s responsibility for the accident
If the plaintiff is found to be 10% at fault and the defendant 90% at fault in Washington, how are the damages split if the total damages are $200,000?
A) The plaintiff receives $20,000
B) The plaintiff receives $180,000
C) The defendant receives $200,000
D) The plaintiff receives $100,000
Answer: B) The plaintiff receives $180,000
In Washington, which of the following is a requirement for the plaintiff to recover damages in a comparative fault case?
A) The plaintiff must prove the defendant was 100% at fault
B) The plaintiff must show the defendant’s fault is greater than the plaintiff’s
C) The plaintiff must show they are less than 50% at fault
D) The plaintiff must show that the accident was caused by external factors only
Answer: C) The plaintiff must show they are less than 50% at fault
If a plaintiff is 40% at fault in Washington and the damages are $75,000, how much will the plaintiff be entitled to recover?
A) $40,000
B) $75,000
C) $45,000
D) $30,000
Answer: C) $45,000
In Washington, what is the effect on the plaintiff’s recovery if they are determined to be 50% or more at fault?
A) The plaintiff can still recover full damages
B) The plaintiff is entitled to half of the damages
C) The plaintiff is not entitled to any damages
D) The plaintiff’s damages are doubled
Answer: C) The plaintiff is not entitled to any damages
Which of the following factors is typically considered when assigning fault in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) The age of the parties involved
B) The insurance coverage of each party
C) The actions and negligence of each party
D) The weather conditions during the accident
Answer: C) The actions and negligence of each party
If both parties in an accident are found equally at fault in Washington, how are damages typically divided?
A) The defendant pays all damages
B) The plaintiff pays half of the damages
C) The damages are equally split between the parties
D) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
Answer: C) The damages are equally split between the parties
In Washington, if a defendant is found to be 70% at fault in an accident and the plaintiff 30%, what is the plaintiff’s recoverable damages if the total damages are $120,000?
A) $120,000
B) $84,000
C) $36,000
D) $72,000
Answer: C) $36,000
Which of the following best describes the nature of Washington’s comparative fault rule?
A) The plaintiff cannot recover damages if they are at fault in any way
B) The plaintiff’s recovery is reduced based on their percentage of fault
C) The defendant is always held fully responsible for the damages
D) Fault is irrelevant to the amount of damages awarded
Answer: B) The plaintiff’s recovery is reduced based on their percentage of fault
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, if a defendant is found to be 30% at fault in an accident with total damages of $200,000, how much will the defendant be responsible for?
A) $60,000
B) $140,000
C) $100,000
D) $200,000
Answer: A) $60,000
How does Washington’s comparative fault system treat joint and several liability in cases where more than one defendant is involved?
A) All defendants are equally liable, regardless of fault
B) Each defendant is only liable for their share of fault
C) The plaintiff can sue any defendant for the full amount of damages
D) The plaintiff must pursue each defendant individually for damages
Answer: B) Each defendant is only liable for their share of fault
If the plaintiff’s damages in Washington are reduced due to comparative fault, what is the effect on the defendant’s liability?
A) The defendant’s liability is unaffected
B) The defendant’s liability increases
C) The defendant is only liable for the portion of the damages corresponding to their fault
D) The defendant can be held liable for the full amount of damages
Answer: C) The defendant is only liable for the portion of the damages corresponding to their fault
Which of the following best describes a “contributory negligence” defense under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) It prevents the plaintiff from recovering any damages if they contributed to the accident
B) It requires the defendant to pay for the plaintiff’s damages even if the plaintiff is at fault
C) It allows the plaintiff to recover full damages if the defendant was primarily at fault
D) It reduces the defendant’s liability based on the plaintiff’s actions that contributed to the accident
Answer: D) It reduces the defendant’s liability based on the plaintiff’s actions that contributed to the accident
If a plaintiff is found to be 10% at fault and the total damages are $150,000, how much can the plaintiff recover in Washington?
A) $135,000
B) $150,000
C) $100,000
D) $45,000
Answer: A) $135,000
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, which of the following is most likely to be considered when determining fault?
A) The amount of time the defendant spent at the scene of the accident
B) The degree of carelessness or recklessness of the parties involved
C) Whether the plaintiff was wearing a helmet or seatbelt
D) The gender or age of the parties involved
Answer: B) The degree of carelessness or recklessness of the parties involved
If a defendant’s actions are found to be 90% responsible for an accident and the plaintiff’s actions are 10% responsible, what is the defendant’s liability in Washington for $80,000 in damages?
A) $72,000
B) $80,000
C) $88,000
D) $20,000
Answer: A) $72,000
Which of the following is a limitation under Washington’s comparative fault system for the plaintiff’s recovery?
A) The plaintiff cannot recover if they are found to be 50% or more at fault
B) The plaintiff cannot recover if their fault is found to be 20% or greater
C) The plaintiff’s recovery is capped at a fixed amount
D) The plaintiff can recover only if the defendant has insurance
Answer: A) The plaintiff cannot recover if they are found to be 50% or more at fault
What happens if both the plaintiff and defendant share the same percentage of fault in Washington?
A) The plaintiff receives full compensation
B) The damages are equally split between the plaintiff and defendant
C) The defendant is not liable for any damages
D) The plaintiff receives only a portion of the damages based on their fault
Answer: B) The damages are equally split between the plaintiff and defendant
In Washington, if a defendant is found to be 60% at fault and the plaintiff is 40% at fault, and the total damages are $50,000, how much will the plaintiff receive?
A) $30,000
B) $50,000
C) $20,000
D) $40,000
Answer: A) $30,000
What does the term “assumption of risk” refer to in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) The defendant’s inability to pay damages
B) The plaintiff’s decision to engage in an activity with known risks
C) The defendant’s liability for damages regardless of fault
D) The court’s ruling that the plaintiff is entitled to full recovery
Answer: B) The plaintiff’s decision to engage in an activity with known risks
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, if the plaintiff’s fault is determined to be 45%, what is the maximum amount they can recover from a defendant?
A) 55% of the total damages
B) 45% of the total damages
C) 100% of the total damages
D) The plaintiff cannot recover anything
Answer: A) 55% of the total damages
In a Washington case involving both the plaintiff and defendant’s fault, which party is responsible for proving the degree of fault?
A) The judge
B) The jury
C) The defendant
D) The plaintiff
Answer: D) The plaintiff
In Washington, if the plaintiff is 55% at fault in an accident with $100,000 in total damages, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $55,000
B) $45,000
C) $0
D) $100,000
Answer: C) $0
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, if a defendant is 100% at fault, what will the plaintiff be entitled to recover?
A) Nothing, because the plaintiff was partially at fault
B) Full recovery of the damages
C) Only half of the total damages
D) Only the damages directly caused by the defendant’s actions
Answer: B) Full recovery of the damages
Which of the following is true in Washington’s comparative fault system regarding a defendant who is found 20% at fault in an accident with total damages of $200,000?
A) The defendant is liable for the entire $200,000
B) The defendant is liable for $40,000
C) The plaintiff’s recovery is reduced by $40,000
D) The defendant is not liable for damages
Answer: B) The defendant is liable for $40,000
In Washington, if both parties in an accident are equally at fault, how are the damages typically divided?
A) The plaintiff recovers full damages
B) Each party pays half of the total damages
C) The damages are not divided, and no one is liable
D) The defendant pays the plaintiff’s full damages
Answer: B) Each party pays half of the total damages
What does the term “modified comparative fault” mean in Washington’s system?
A) The defendant can only be found liable if they are 50% or more at fault
B) The plaintiff can recover damages even if they are 100% at fault
C) The plaintiff’s recovery is reduced in proportion to their fault, but they can still recover if they are less than 50% at fault
D) The plaintiff must be found to have no fault to recover any damages
Answer: C) The plaintiff’s recovery is reduced in proportion to their fault, but they can still recover if they are less than 50% at fault
In Washington, if a defendant is 80% at fault and the total damages are $150,000, how much will the defendant be responsible for paying?
A) $150,000
B) $120,000
C) $30,000
D) $80,000
Answer: B) $120,000
In Washington, what happens if the plaintiff is found to be 50% or more at fault?
A) The plaintiff can still recover damages, but the recovery will be reduced
B) The plaintiff will receive full recovery of damages
C) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
D) The plaintiff must pay for the defendant’s damages
Answer: C) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
How does Washington’s comparative fault system differ from a contributory negligence system?
A) In contributory negligence, any fault by the plaintiff bars recovery, while comparative fault reduces recovery based on the plaintiff’s fault
B) In comparative fault, the defendant is always fully liable for the damages
C) In contributory negligence, only the plaintiff’s actions are considered in the fault allocation
D) In comparative fault, the plaintiff’s recovery is unaffected by their degree of fault
Answer: A) In contributory negligence, any fault by the plaintiff bars recovery, while comparative fault reduces recovery based on the plaintiff’s fault
Which of the following is NOT typically a factor in determining the plaintiff’s degree of fault under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) The severity of the plaintiff’s negligence
B) Whether the plaintiff was aware of potential risks
C) The plaintiff’s ability to avoid the accident
D) The defendant’s actions and level of negligence
Answer: D) The defendant’s actions and level of negligence
In Washington, if the total damages are $50,000, and the plaintiff is found to be 20% at fault, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $40,000
B) $30,000
C) $25,000
D) $50,000
Answer: A) $40,000
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, which of the following best describes a scenario where the defendant is 90% at fault and the plaintiff is 10% at fault for an accident with damages totaling $300,000?
A) The plaintiff can recover $300,000 in full
B) The defendant is responsible for $300,000
C) The defendant is responsible for $270,000, and the plaintiff can recover $270,000
D) The defendant is responsible for $270,000, and the plaintiff can recover $30,000
Answer: D) The defendant is responsible for $270,000, and the plaintiff can recover $30,000
If the defendant is 60% at fault and the plaintiff is 40% at fault for an accident with total damages of $500,000, how much can the plaintiff recover under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) $300,000
B) $500,000
C) $200,000
D) $150,000
Answer: C) $200,000
If a jury determines the plaintiff to be 35% at fault for an accident with $100,000 in damages, how much can the plaintiff recover under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) $35,000
B) $65,000
C) $100,000
D) $0
Answer: B) $65,000
In Washington, if a defendant is 80% at fault for an accident and the plaintiff is 20% at fault, and the damages total $500,000, how much will the plaintiff be entitled to recover?
A) $400,000
B) $300,000
C) $500,000
D) $100,000
Answer: B) $300,000
Which of the following is most likely to be considered in the fault allocation process under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) The plaintiff’s age
B) The financial resources of each party
C) The relative actions and negligence of both parties
D) The weather conditions at the time of the accident
Answer: C) The relative actions and negligence of both parties
If the plaintiff in Washington is found 49% at fault for an accident and the total damages are $250,000, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $125,000
B) $250,000
C) $127,500
D) $127,000
Answer: C) $127,500
In Washington, if the defendant is found 90% at fault and the total damages are $80,000, how much will the defendant be required to pay?
A) $72,000
B) $8,000
C) $100,000
D) $80,000
Answer: A) $72,000
If the plaintiff is 50% or more at fault for an accident in Washington, what is the plaintiff entitled to?
A) Full recovery of damages
B) Partial recovery, reduced by the plaintiff’s fault
C) No recovery of damages
D) Recovery based on the defendant’s fault percentage
Answer: C) No recovery of damages
In Washington, if both the plaintiff and the defendant are equally at fault for an accident with total damages of $100,000, how much will each party pay?
A) The defendant pays $50,000, and the plaintiff pays $50,000
B) The defendant pays the entire $100,000
C) The plaintiff recovers $100,000
D) The defendant pays $75,000, and the plaintiff pays $25,000
Answer: A) The defendant pays $50,000, and the plaintiff pays $50,000
In Washington, if a plaintiff is 20% at fault for an accident and the defendant is 80% at fault, and the total damages are $150,000, how much will the plaintiff recover?
A) $120,000
B) $30,000
C) $150,000
D) $100,000
Answer: A) $120,000
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, if a defendant is found to be 100% responsible for an accident, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) The plaintiff recovers nothing due to their partial fault
B) The plaintiff may recover only 50% of the damages
C) The plaintiff may recover the full amount of damages
D) The plaintiff’s recovery is reduced by the defendant’s fault percentage
Answer: C) The plaintiff may recover the full amount of damages
In Washington, if a plaintiff’s damages total $200,000 and they are found to be 10% at fault, how much can they recover?
A) $200,000
B) $180,000
C) $20,000
D) $150,000
Answer: B) $180,000
Which of the following factors could influence the degree of fault attributed to a plaintiff in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) The defendant’s intent to cause harm
B) Whether the plaintiff was aware of the risks
C) The speed at which the plaintiff was driving
D) Both B and C
Answer: D) Both B and C
If a jury finds that the plaintiff is 75% at fault and the defendant is 25% at fault for an accident with total damages of $400,000, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $100,000
B) $300,000
C) $400,000
D) $75,000
Answer: A) $100,000
If a plaintiff is 40% at fault for an accident, and the defendant is found to be 60% at fault, and the damages are $500,000, how much will the defendant be required to pay under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) $500,000
B) $300,000
C) $400,000
D) $60,000
Answer: C) $400,000
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, which of the following best describes how a court may apportion fault when both parties are partially responsible for the accident?
A) The plaintiff is never entitled to recover anything if they are at fault
B) The defendant pays all damages
C) Fault is apportioned based on the degree of negligence of each party
D) The court ignores the plaintiff’s fault and only considers the defendant’s actions
Answer: C) Fault is apportioned based on the degree of negligence of each party
What would happen in Washington if the plaintiff is found to be 50% or more at fault for their injuries?
A) The plaintiff can recover only half of the damages
B) The plaintiff would not be able to recover any damages
C) The plaintiff can recover full damages, but the defendant pays only their fault percentage
D) The plaintiff’s recovery is unaffected by their degree of fault
Answer: B) The plaintiff would not be able to recover any damages
In Washington, if the total damages are $60,000, and the plaintiff is 25% at fault while the defendant is 75% at fault, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $45,000
B) $60,000
C) $15,000
D) $30,000
Answer: A) $45,000
How does Washington’s comparative fault system affect the determination of liability in an accident where both parties contributed to the incident?
A) The defendant is automatically responsible for all damages
B) The plaintiff is always entitled to recover damages, regardless of their fault
C) Each party is held responsible for their percentage of fault in the accident
D) Only the defendant’s fault is considered when determining liability
Answer: C) Each party is held responsible for their percentage of fault in the accident
If the plaintiff is found 90% at fault for an accident and the total damages amount to $100,000, how much can the plaintiff recover under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) $90,000
B) $10,000
C) $0
D) $100,000
Answer: B) $10,000
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, how does the court assess fault in cases involving multiple defendants?
A) Each defendant is held liable for their proportionate share of the damages
B) Only the defendant with the greatest fault is responsible for the damages
C) The plaintiff is responsible for paying damages if they are partially at fault
D) The court ignores the fault of the plaintiff and assigns responsibility based solely on the defendants
Answer: A) Each defendant is held liable for their proportionate share of the damages
In a case where both the plaintiff and defendant are at fault in Washington, and the plaintiff’s fault is determined to be 45% and the defendant’s 55%, what would the plaintiff’s recovery be if the total damages are $200,000?
A) $110,000
B) $90,000
C) $45,000
D) $200,000
Answer: B) $90,000
In Washington’s comparative fault system, if the defendant is found to be 90% at fault and the plaintiff 10% at fault for an accident with damages totaling $400,000, how much will the plaintiff be entitled to recover?
A) $40,000
B) $360,000
C) $90,000
D) $400,000
Answer: B) $360,000
What is one of the main purposes of Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) To assign full liability to the plaintiff if they are partially at fault
B) To reduce the defendant’s liability based on their proportion of fault
C) To ensure that only plaintiffs who are completely innocent are entitled to compensation
D) To increase the amount of damages a defendant is liable for in comparative cases
Answer: B) To reduce the defendant’s liability based on their proportion of fault
In a comparative fault case in Washington, if a plaintiff is found to be 70% at fault and the defendant is 30% at fault, what is the plaintiff’s maximum possible recovery in a $50,000 damages case?
A) $35,000
B) $50,000
C) $15,000
D) $0
Answer: C) $15,000
If the jury finds that the plaintiff is 50% or more at fault for an accident in Washington, what is the effect on the plaintiff’s recovery?
A) The plaintiff can still recover a reduced amount of damages
B) The plaintiff can recover full damages
C) The plaintiff can recover only 50% of the damages
D) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
Answer: D) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
In Washington, if a plaintiff’s damages amount to $80,000, and they are 30% at fault for the accident, how much can they recover from the defendant?
A) $80,000
B) $60,000
C) $40,000
D) $30,000
Answer: B) $60,000
If the plaintiff is 40% at fault in a case where the defendant is 60% at fault, and the total damages are $150,000, how much can the plaintiff recover in Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) $90,000
B) $60,000
C) $100,000
D) $150,000
Answer: A) $90,000
Which of the following is a key characteristic of Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) Fault is distributed equally between the parties
B) The plaintiff can recover full damages even if they are partially at fault
C) The amount of damages a plaintiff can recover is reduced based on their percentage of fault
D) The plaintiff is only allowed to recover damages if they are less than 25% at fault
Answer: C) The amount of damages a plaintiff can recover is reduced based on their percentage of fault
In Washington, if a defendant is found 90% at fault and the plaintiff is found 10% at fault for an accident resulting in $200,000 in damages, how much will the defendant be required to pay?
A) $180,000
B) $200,000
C) $20,000
D) $10,000
Answer: A) $180,000
In a Washington comparative fault case, how does the court treat situations where both parties contributed to the accident?
A) The defendant is always responsible for paying the damages
B) The plaintiff is never responsible for paying damages
C) Fault is assigned proportionally to each party’s contribution to the accident
D) The plaintiff cannot recover damages if they were at fault
Answer: C) Fault is assigned proportionally to each party’s contribution to the accident
If the total damages in a Washington comparative fault case amount to $120,000, and the plaintiff is found 60% at fault while the defendant is 40% at fault, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $72,000
B) $60,000
C) $48,000
D) $120,000
Answer: C) $48,000
In Washington, which of the following scenarios would prevent a plaintiff from recovering any damages under the comparative fault system?
A) The plaintiff is found to be 49% at fault for the accident
B) The plaintiff is found to be 51% or more at fault for the accident
C) The plaintiff is found 10% at fault for the accident
D) The defendant’s actions are 100% responsible for the accident
Answer: B) The plaintiff is found to be 51% or more at fault for the accident
In Washington’s comparative fault system, how is a plaintiff’s fault assessed?
A) The plaintiff’s fault is ignored in the calculation of damages
B) Fault is based on the plaintiff’s contribution to the accident and how their actions compare to the defendant’s actions
C) The plaintiff’s fault is automatically deemed less significant than the defendant’s
D) Fault is calculated based on the severity of the plaintiff’s injuries
Answer: B) Fault is based on the plaintiff’s contribution to the accident and how their actions compare to the defendant’s actions
If a defendant is found to be 75% at fault for an accident and the plaintiff 25%, and the total damages are $100,000, how much will the defendant be required to pay under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) $75,000
B) $100,000
C) $25,000
D) $50,000
Answer: A) $75,000
In Washington, if both parties are partially at fault for an accident, what is the effect on the total recovery for the plaintiff?
A) The plaintiff can recover the full amount of damages
B) The plaintiff’s recovery is reduced based on the percentage of their fault
C) The defendant must cover all the damages
D) The plaintiff is barred from recovering damages if they were at fault
Answer: B) The plaintiff’s recovery is reduced based on the percentage of their fault
If the plaintiff is 25% at fault and the defendant is 75% at fault for an accident with damages of $80,000, how much will the plaintiff recover in Washington?
A) $80,000
B) $60,000
C) $20,000
D) $75,000
Answer: B) $60,000
Under Washington’s comparative fault law, if a plaintiff’s fault is more than 50%, what is the outcome of the case?
A) The plaintiff may still recover partial damages
B) The defendant may pay full damages if the plaintiff’s fault is only slightly more than 50%
C) The plaintiff cannot recover damages
D) The defendant automatically pays for the damages
Answer: C) The plaintiff cannot recover damages
In Washington, when comparing fault in a car accident, what factors might the court consider in assigning responsibility to each party?
A) The speed at which each driver was traveling
B) The weather conditions at the time of the accident
C) Whether the plaintiff was wearing a seatbelt
D) All of the above
Answer: D) All of the above
If the defendant is found to be 100% at fault in Washington’s comparative fault system, the plaintiff can recover:
A) Only a portion of the damages based on the defendant’s fault
B) The full amount of damages
C) No recovery because the plaintiff contributed to the accident
D) The defendant’s insurance company pays the full amount
Answer: B) The full amount of damages
In Washington’s comparative fault system, if a plaintiff is found to be 55% at fault and the total damages are $200,000, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $90,000
B) $45,000
C) $100,000
D) $0
Answer: D) $0
Which of the following statements about Washington’s comparative fault system is accurate?
A) The plaintiff cannot recover damages if they are found to be at fault for the accident
B) The defendant must pay the full damages regardless of the plaintiff’s fault
C) The plaintiff’s recovery is reduced based on their proportion of fault in the accident
D) Only the defendant’s actions are considered in the comparative fault analysis
Answer: C) The plaintiff’s recovery is reduced based on their proportion of fault in the accident
In a Washington comparative fault case, if the plaintiff is determined to be 50% at fault and the damages are $100,000, what happens?
A) The plaintiff can recover $50,000
B) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
C) The plaintiff can recover the full $100,000
D) The defendant pays the full amount of damages
Answer: B) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
How does Washington’s comparative fault system impact personal injury lawsuits?
A) It allows plaintiffs to recover full damages regardless of fault
B) It reduces the amount a plaintiff can recover based on their contribution to the accident
C) It prohibits plaintiffs from recovering damages if they are partially at fault
D) It ensures that only defendants with the highest percentage of fault pay damages
Answer: B) It reduces the amount a plaintiff can recover based on their contribution to the accident
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, if both the plaintiff and defendant share equal fault, the total damages are $100,000. How much will each party pay?
A) Each pays $50,000
B) The plaintiff pays $100,000
C) The defendant pays $100,000
D) The plaintiff pays $25,000, and the defendant pays $75,000
Answer: A) Each pays $50,000
Under Washington’s comparative fault law, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the total damages amount to $50,000, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $35,000
B) $50,000
C) $15,000
D) $30,000
Answer: A) $35,000
What happens if the plaintiff is found to be 51% at fault for an accident in Washington?
A) The plaintiff can still recover a reduced amount of damages
B) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
C) The defendant pays the full amount of damages
D) The case is automatically dismissed
Answer: B) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
If the total damages in a Washington comparative fault case are $120,000, and the plaintiff is found 80% at fault, what amount can the plaintiff recover from the defendant?
A) $120,000
B) $100,000
C) $24,000
D) $0
Answer: D) $0
In Washington, if both parties are found partially at fault, how does the court assign responsibility for damages?
A) The court divides the damages equally between both parties
B) The defendant pays the full amount of damages
C) The court assigns fault based on the percentage of each party’s contribution to the accident
D) The plaintiff pays for their own damages
Answer: C) The court assigns fault based on the percentage of each party’s contribution to the accident
If the defendant is found to be 40% at fault for an accident, and the plaintiff is found 60% at fault, what is the maximum amount the defendant will have to pay under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) 40% of the damages
B) 60% of the damages
C) The defendant pays for the entire damages
D) The defendant does not have to pay any damages
Answer: A) 40% of the damages
In Washington, if a party is found 25% at fault in a case with damages totaling $400,000, how much can the party recover?
A) $300,000
B) $100,000
C) $75,000
D) $50,000
Answer: A) $300,000
How does Washington’s comparative fault system treat cases where both parties are equally at fault for an accident?
A) Both parties are barred from recovering damages
B) The defendant pays the entire amount of damages
C) Each party recovers half of the total damages
D) The plaintiff can recover full damages
Answer: C) Each party recovers half of the total damages
In Washington, if the total damages for an accident are $80,000 and the defendant is 90% at fault while the plaintiff is 10% at fault, how much will the defendant be required to pay?
A) $10,000
B) $80,000
C) $72,000
D) $88,000
Answer: C) $72,000
If a plaintiff is found 50% at fault for an accident with $200,000 in damages, and the defendant is found 50% at fault, how much will the plaintiff be able to recover under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) $100,000
B) $50,000
C) $200,000
D) $0
Answer: A) $100,000
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, if a plaintiff is found to be 40% at fault and the defendant is 60% at fault, with total damages of $120,000, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $72,000
B) $40,000
C) $48,000
D) $60,000
Answer: A) $72,000
What does Washington’s comparative fault system require regarding the jury’s determination of fault?
A) The jury must assign equal fault to both parties
B) The jury determines the percentage of fault for each party based on their actions in the accident
C) The jury must determine the defendant’s fault before the plaintiff’s fault
D) The jury cannot assign fault to the plaintiff
Answer: B) The jury determines the percentage of fault for each party based on their actions in the accident
If the plaintiff’s actions contributed 30% to the accident and the defendant’s actions contributed 70%, what is the maximum recovery the plaintiff can receive under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) 70% of the total damages
B) 30% of the total damages
C) 50% of the total damages
D) Full recovery
Answer: A) 70% of the total damages
In Washington, if the plaintiff is 40% at fault and the defendant is 60% at fault for an accident with $500,000 in damages, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $200,000
B) $300,000
C) $500,000
D) $400,000
Answer: B) $300,000
In Washington, what is the effect on the plaintiff’s recovery if they are found to be 51% or more at fault for the accident?
A) The plaintiff can still recover a reduced amount
B) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
C) The defendant must pay the full amount
D) The case is dismissed entirely
Answer: B) The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
If a defendant is found 70% at fault and the total damages are $90,000, what amount will the defendant be responsible for paying under Washington’s comparative fault system?
A) $70,000
B) $90,000
C) $27,000
D) $30,000
Answer: A) $70,000
Which of the following best describes Washington’s system of comparative fault?
A) Fault is allocated based on the severity of injuries
B) The plaintiff is not allowed to recover damages if they are found partially at fault
C) Fault is allocated based on the percentage of fault of each party, and damages are reduced proportionally
D) The defendant must pay full damages unless the plaintiff is 50% or more at fault
Answer: C) Fault is allocated based on the percentage of fault of each party, and damages are reduced proportionally
If the plaintiff is found to be 10% at fault and the total damages are $200,000, how much can the defendant recover if the defendant is found 90% at fault?
A) $180,000
B) $200,000
C) $10,000
D) $0
Answer: A) $180,000
In Washington’s comparative fault system, if a party is found 50% or less at fault, they are able to recover:
A) 100% of the damages
B) No damages
C) A reduced portion of the damages based on their percentage of fault
D) Only if the defendant is found 100% at fault
Answer: C) A reduced portion of the damages based on their percentage of fault
Under Washington’s comparative fault system, if the plaintiff is found 20% at fault and the defendant is found 80% at fault, what percentage of the total damages will the defendant be required to pay?
A) 80%
B) 20%
C) 100%
D) 60%
Answer: A) 80%
In Washington, if the plaintiff is found 50% at fault and the defendant is found 50% at fault for an accident that results in $1,000,000 in damages, how much can the plaintiff recover?
A) $1,000,000
B) $500,000
C) $0
D) $250,000
Answer: B) $500,000